Skip to content

The Stick is the Law. And so is the Carrot

Luther PreachingRecently I taught on Luther's theology of the word. I spoke of the movement God's word makes with us - to kill and to make alive; to uproot and to plant; to tear down and to build.

Consider Genesis 1 - first darkness then light; first the seed then the fruit; first forming then filling.

Consider Genesis 2 - first the man goes into death-sleep then he's raised to unite with his bride.

Consider Genesis 3 - first Adam takes us into curse, then the promised Seed will bring deliverance.

Consider Abraham - first barrenness according to the flesh then life according to the promise.

Consider Moses - even before Israel enters the land he tells them of their inevitable exile and then the LORD will bring them home with an almighty atonement.

Consider Isaiah - he must proclaim the hacking down of Israel's tree until only the Holy Seed is left (Isaiah 6).

Consider Jeremiah - his word to the nation is first judgement then salvation (Jeremiah 1:4-10; cf Jeremiah 31)

Luther did not invent an arbitrary distinction with law and gospel. Rather, he named the pattern of the Word in evidence on every page. This patterns goes through death and, only in going through death, we then enter resurrection. (You'll notice how law-gospel preaching goes hand in hand with a theology of the cross).

Therefore our proclamation should take the same shape. We preach the inability of the flesh, of the will, of human effort when it comes to establishing the wondrously good life of God's kingdom. The law is good - really, fantastically good. But it reveals that we are bad - stinkingly, horrifyingly bad. We preach the reality of our own spiritual death and then we declare the life that comes from outside ourselves. We point to the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. You could call that law-gospel preaching if you like, but Luther has no trademark on it. It's the kind of thing you have to preach if you believe salvation comes only from Christ and never from us.

Anyway... I was teaching these kinds of things recently and two people asked questions in quick succession. The first asked: "What about Leviticus 26-27 - that takes the pattern of blessings then curses." The second asked about Luke 6 - Jesus proclaims blessings then woes. If the shape of the word is law then gospel, why are these significant portions of Scripture proclaiming a 'positive message' and then a 'negative message'?

The answer is fairly straightforward - both blessings and curses are law! In fact they are the quintessence of law.

Law is: "If you... Then He'll..."

Gospel is "Since He... You are..."

Notice therefore that "If you... Then He'll..." is a message that could include curses or blessings. If you obey then He'll bless you. If you disobey, then He'll curse you. Whether the carrot is being dangled or the stick is being threatened the real issue is the phrase "If you...". What makes these messages law is not the curses or the carrots, it's the conditionality.

Both carrot and stick are law. And notice how Moses uses them. In Leviticus 26-27 (and in Deuteronomy) he outlines the potential blessings from Mount Gerazim and then the curses from Mount Ebal (of course he spends much longer on the curses!) By the time you get to Deuteronomy it becomes very obvious (see Deut 4 and Deut 30-34) that Israel will go into the curses of exile and only then attain to the blessings. Curses and blessings are not so much alternative possibilities but consecutive stages in their history.

Think how Jesus uses the blessings and woes in Luke 6. Blessed are those who have absolutely nothing. Cursed are those who think they have it made. Both sides of the coin uphold the one truth - we've got nothing, everything must come from heaven. In other words, it's all about the good law describing the good life that is entirely beyond us. Both the "positive message" of the blessings and the "negative message" of the woes are proclaiming our inability and God's all-sufficiency.

So let me draw a couple of points of application. First, there really is a shape to God's word. We know this supremely because God's Word is Jesus. And there's a shape to Jesus' life - down into the curses then rising into blessing. Certainly the little slice of Scripture we're reading might start with a "nice bit" and end with a "hard bit", but that slice of Scripture exists within a larger context. And if we're preaching, we're called to preach the larger context. We don't proclaim Luke 6:20-26, we proclaim Jesus from Luke 6:20-26. We never want to make the mistake of the Pharisees in John 5 - seeking life in the passage rather than the Person. If we preach the Person then we have to preach the pattern of that Person - a pattern that will be evidenced in the passage too, if we would only do our homework. But that pattern is down and then up, cross then resurrection, law then gospel.

Second, legalistic preaching (preaching law without gospel) is not always harsh-sounding preaching. It could be all about blessings, all about carrots, all about your best life now - if you.... If you only do this, or think that, or be the other - then you'll be blessed. Such a message might sound incredibly positive, but ultimately it's crushing because it's all about you.

Third, law-gospel preaching is not about balancing carrots and sticks. It's not about ensuring we play off the 'nice Scriptures' with the 'harsh ones' so that we're properly rounded. Some might be adept at sugar-coating some hard truths with some sweet verses. Others might temper their lovely promises with fearful warnings. But that is not law-gospel preaching - that is law-law preaching. "Christ is the end of the law that there may be righteousness for everyone who simply believes." (Romans 10:4)

Let's not leave our hearers in between Mount Gerazim and Mount Ebal. Let's take them on the journey that Scripture takes... through the curses into the blessings, through Golgotha and up to Zion. And let's make sure we preach Christ as the One who makes it happen.

 

 

6 thoughts on “The Stick is the Law. And so is the Carrot

  1. Cal

    I appreciate a lot of Luther's insights, but while we retool exactly what "law-gospel" means, doesn't that still malign the law when in other places it is praised?

    Primarily, I'm thinking of what James calls the "perfect law of liberty" or even the promise of Jeremiah to write the law on our hearts.

    Can the law be fulfilled? It seems so, even to a man's righteousness (i.e. Abraham, Priest Simeon etc.). However, as you pointed out time and again, the law reveals sin, and the purposes of Torah was to sweep man up into faith in the Messiah, the Promise, the Holy Seed.

    Again, I love many of the truths that Luther recovered, but I think he wrongly articulated them at points. Maybe the separation is between curse-promise or Union w/Adam-Union w/Christ.

    I think someone like NT Wright's insights are helpful to balance. I guess I'm a non-Lutheran Luther man.

    Thoughts,
    Cal

  2. the Old Adam

    The law can NEVER give us life.

    It is good in that it kills us off to any pretentions of righteousness...and that it drives us to Christ. "It was our tutor until Christ came".

    "Christ is the end of the law for all those who have faith."

  3. Glen

    Thanks Steve.

    Hi Cal, I tried to be positive throughout about the law. I think it is holy, righteous and wonderfully good (it's we who are bad). And I think it serves a wonderful purpose of *describing* the good life of the kingdom even though we must also maintain that it can't deliver that good life.

  4. Cal

    So essentially, because Moses is, like all the other shadows/types, outside of us, it unveils the 'blessed life' but also gives a sting to sin. It is good and holy, but to us a ministry of death. The administration of Moses was temporary for the eternal law of Christ which we are now 'in', the law of love.

    Christ boils Moses down to its reality, which is only found in following Him. I can't go with you Steve to say that the Sermon on the Mount, even the command you put, is merely to break us. It has some merit to it, but I think Bonhoeffer captured it when he believed it an impossible possibility. We must follow Jesus' command, and yet realize that that life is outside of us.

    Again, Jesus says if we love Him, we will obey His commands. Yet such 'ability' only comes in the call from Jesus, the Word's work, and those blessed words "follow me". Like Augustine, "Give what you command, and command what you will".

    Ultimately, maybe I'm just not understanding. Any resources worth checking out?

    Cal

  5. Glen

    Hey Cal,

    I like all that you say here. I think we don't dwell enough on the *theological* use of the law enough - this revelation of the Lord's own character. When this is done rightly it should never be a case of the law simply breaking us. It reveals Christ Himself in all His glory. And, yes, that has a judging aspect to it. Yet this Good Life becomes a sheer gift when we look beyond our abilities to Him alone.

    On resources - I really like Thurneyson on the Sermon on the Mount (Barth's best friend) - He gets the whole thing as a proclamation of Christ Himself and therefore something we're included in by faith.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Twitter widget by Rimon Habib - BuddyPress Expert Developer