321 and Repentance (part one)

This is part of a series exploring the interaction of 321 and the four events which more commonly organise an evangelistic presentation.  We’ve had

—  321 and Creation

—  321 and Fall

—  321 and Redemption

Now we’ll consider 321 and Repentance.

You’ll notice that I’m not considering Creation, Fall, Redemption and Consummation.  More properly those are the four gospel events – all four resting in God’s hands.  I’m considering “repentance” rather  than “consummation” simply because the evangelistic presentations with which we’re familiar tend to finish with our work not God’s.  And perhaps that’s significant!  We’ll see.

Today we’ll examine repentance according to 3, 2 and 1.  Tomorrow we’ll draw out some implications…

How does 3 shape our understanding of repentance?

Trinity means that God is Giver (see here).  Therefore the Fall is a failure to receive from the giving God (see here).  What then will repentance involve?  Well it can’t involve a summoning up of religious resolve!  It can’t be the determination of the sinner to “get serious” and start making up the missed payments.  That kind of self-will is virtually the essence of sin!

No, repentance with the triune God means receiving the gift of the Son.  The Father has given Christ to the world (John 3:16).  The new life is not in us – it’s in Jesus (1 John 5:11).  Repentance – the new life we must have – is a gift of the Father, present in the Son, offered by the Spirit (Acts 5:31; Acts 11:18; 2 Timothy 2:25).

How does 2 shape our understanding of repentance?

Adam cannot repent.  Adam can only perish.  This is a vital point to grasp and Edward Fisher in The Marrow of Modern Divinity expressed it well in dialogue form:

— I conceive that repentance consists in a man’s humbling himself before God, and sorrowing and grieving for offending him by his sins, and in turning from them all to the Lord.

— And would you have a man to do all this truly before he come to Christ by believing?

— Yea, indeed, I think it is very meet he should.

Why, then, I tell you truly, you would have him to do that which is impossible.

According to Paul, the unbeliever is dead in transgressions and sins and bound to Satan (Eph 2:1-3).  No exercise of moral or religious effort can deliver such a person (Phil 3:1-9).  The law, even the law of God, is powerless to save (Rom 3:20; 8:3).  And so the unbeliever is sunk in sin and flesh, bound to Satan, under the law’s condemnation, without hope and without God in the world (Eph 2:12).  There is nothing within the unbeliever that will help them.  Asking Adam to repent is like asking a corpse to ‘get fit’.  There needs to be a new life.  But the unbeliever is in no position to summon it.

How does 1 shape our understanding of repentance?

When I married my wife, “single Glen” died.  That old existence was put to death in our covenant union.  In this sense “old Glen” did not contribute to the marriage, “old Glen” was killed by the marriage.  I became new in one-ness with my wife.  And this newness was a radical, all-of-life revolution.  Nothing remained the same.  Every aspect of my life had to be rethought according to my married identity.  But I didn’t earn any of this.  It was all a gift that came part-and-parcel with the marriage.

In the same way, sinners are offered covenant union with Christ.  In this oneness they are killed and given a new existence.  Everything is different.  Nothing remains untouched by this unbreakable oneness.  The sinner does not (and cannot) earn it.  But in Jesus there is, suddenly, a new creation, the old has gone, the new has come (2 Corinthians 5:17).

So then, what kind of “repentance” does 321 preach?

Let me break it down into some propositions that I tweeted earlier in the year:

  • Adam cannot repent. Adam can only perish.
  • True repentance must be done to us (as faith is done to us) since the greatest sin is to imagine that we can ‘do penance.’
  • There cannot be impenitent faith (if it’s true faith) or unbelieving repentance (if it’s true repentance).
  • Repentance and faith are not two separate stages of salvation. They are two sides of the same coin. But note – this is a coin God gives to us!
  • Repentance is given to us because Christ is given to us – and that’s the direction of travel, from Him to us.
  • We do not offer repentance to God as our part of the bargain. We’re summoned to repentance in the gospel because this is the life of faith.

And as we offer Christ, we tell the unbeliever exactly what a life of one-ness will look like with Jesus.  Just as ‘marriage prep’ unveils the good and the bad of the union on offer, so we prepare people for the radical, total-life-change which Jesus brings.  But at the end of the day we offer Christ.  And we say as Spurgeon did:

Do not attempt to touch yourself up and make yourself something other than you really are, but come as you are to Him who justifies the ungodly. …The Gospel will receive you into its halls if you come as a sinner, not otherwise. Wait not for reformation, but come at once for salvation. God justifieth the ungodly, and that takes you up where you now are; it meets you in your worst estate. Come in your disorder. I mean, come to your heavenly Father in all your sin and sinfulness. Come to Jesus just as you are: filthy, naked, neither fit to live nor fit to die. Come, you that are the very sweepings of creation; come, though you hardly dare to hope for anything but death. Come, though despair is brooding over you, pressing upon your bosom like a horrible nightmare. Come and ask the Lord to justify another ungodly one. (From “Justification of the Ungodly” by C.H. Spurgeon.  A sermon on Romans 4:5 – found in “All of Grace“)

For more on preaching repentance in evangelism, see this paper I wrote a few years ago.

And stay tuned for part two where we’ll tease out some more implications…

Posted on by glenscriv in 321, evangelism, faith, gospel, repentance

9 Responses to 321 and Repentance (part one)

  1. Paul Austin

    As always, remarkably good stuff. I suppose someone has already brought up Matt. 3.2, 8 so you will answer it at some point.
    By the way, repentance as a life long affair may have been one of the points which led the RCatholics to say salvation is a life long process which is never complete. You might want to address the possible interpretation that if repentance is life long it is never accomplished.
    An Episcopal priest in my area who graduated from an evangelical seminary once said in a sermon that the gospel truly preached is easier to misunderstand than any religion.
    Paul in Dallas TX

  2. James

    Very true that many gospel presentations end with an emphasis on our work. Yet the call to repentance and faith are undoubtedly part of Gospel proclamation. So how do we do it without making it sound like it’s the sinner’s ‘part of the bargain’?

  3. Glen

    Hi Paul,

    The Kingdom having come (in the King) is the crucial context of ‘repent and believe’. There is a gift to be received in *this* way (repentance and faith).

    I think marriage helps with the once-for-all and ongoing nature of repentance. There is a change of state at a point in time ushering in a whole new way of life. It should also be clear that the new life is in no sense a payment but the good news of a new way of being.

  4. Glen

    Hi James,

    I’d say we offer union with the Son and say ‘Have Him. It means death to the old (single) you and a whole new way of life, but it’s Real Life and its yours for free. Do you want Him?’ Something like that?

  5. theoldadam

    I wouldn’t even go that far, holding Him out as something to take, or reject. I would just announce it; “It is finished”. Christ Jesus has done this (died for you, forgiven you, accepted you… while you were yet a sinner).

    God creates faith (when and where He will) in the announcement and hearing of this Good News (Romans 1:16).

    We announce it (along with the hard proclamation of God’s law), each week in our worship service.

    For we always need it. The entire life of the Christian is one of repentance and forgiveness. We never progress beyond it.

  6. Ken

    Glen, I love following you through this, but if we leave out the Holy Spirit’s
    quickening power giving life to a dead man, how can a dead man want to receive Christ? Maybe you wrote on that, and I just missed it. Thanks

  7. Ken

    theoldadam’s comment came in while I was writing (when and where He will)
    That’s how I would say it too. I might add insist that people believe…Leave the rest to God.

  8. Pingback: 321 and Repentance (part two) « Christ the Truth

  9. Pingback: Top Ten Posts This Year « Christ the Truth

Add a Comment

Twitter widget by Rimon Habib - BuddyPress Expert Developer